The Gift Of Al ‘Zeke’ Zarilla

Posted June 4th, 2013 by Tom Owens and filed in 1952 Topps, Al "Zeke" Zarilla, Sports Collectors Digest

I would have loved
a real autograph on mine!
 

A long time ago, in a galaxy far away…

I was a staff member at Sports Collectors Digest.

One staff member had attended a hobby show event in Hawaii. He was muttering about a question from former outfielder Al Zarilla.

Zarilla saw several people admiring and speculating on a mint 1952 Topps picturing the man nicknamed “Zeke.”

He asked the hobby insiders how much more the card would be worth once he autographed it.

To the SCD staffer, he imagined only the lessened value. This pundit told Zarilla HIS truth, that the card would be worth less.

I never knew if Zarilla believed it. Sure, “mint” is a subjective term. Was the card untouched or unaltered by human hands through the years?

To Zarilla, the autograph was a gift. Like the prize at the bottom of the cereal box. Only 1990s collectors who reached the retiree by mail in Hawaii had a chance at his signature. A company could make tons of cards. Only one man could sign “Al Zarilla” and mean it. Like an artist and artwork, the autograph was something he had created for someone. He saw true value in that.

I second that emotion, Al.

3 Responses to “The Gift Of Al ‘Zeke’ Zarilla”

  1. Steve D says:

    Here’s a humble 30-year-old’s take on this:

    The guy was pretty much right in the sense that, on the secondary market, the signing of a card negates most (if not all) of whatever value the card had before, and at that point, the signature is the thing giving it any value. That isn’t to say that the staffer was dissing Zarilla, or autographs in general. Also, keep in mind: yes, a company can produce tons of cards, but the owner of said company could also take tons of those cards out to sea and dump them, making that particular year rarer, as Sy Berger did with the unsold ’52s. (Now if only we all could collectively get together and do that with all our 1990 Topps or 1991 Fleer and make those worth something.)

    With collectors of vintage cards, they need to have cards in the best possible condition (that they can afford, anyway). To them, an autograph on a vintage (or rare) card is not a good thing.

    Collectors of autographed cards, on the other hand, such as I, usually don’t care how valuable/great/amazing the card is by itself…if we can get it signed, we’ll jump at the chance. A lot of us have no use for a card unless it’s signed.

  2. Andy P says:

    I used to promote card shows in Hawaii and Al Zarilla was a frequent guest. He would always take the time to talk to everyone who purchased his autograph and to thank them. He loved talking baseball. While it’s true that his signing a card might devalue it on the secondary market, anyone who had Zeke sign a card for him in person in Hawaii would tell you that the card (and the experience) were priceless.

  3. Tom Owens says:

    Agreed, and agreed, to both comments! An autograph should be an experience, not just a product. Interacting with a current or former player makes the signature even sweeter!

Leave a Reply

*